Configure a Security Context for a Pod or Container
A security context defines privilege and access control settings for a Pod or Container. Security context settings include, but are not limited to:
-
Discretionary Access Control: Permission to access an object, like a file, is based on user ID (UID) and group ID (GID).
-
Security Enhanced Linux (SELinux): Objects are assigned security labels.
-
Running as privileged or unprivileged.
-
Linux Capabilities: Give a process some privileges, but not all the privileges of the root user.
-
AppArmor: Use program profiles to restrict the capabilities of individual programs.
-
Seccomp: Filter a process's system calls.
-
AllowPrivilegeEscalation: Controls whether a process can gain more privileges than its parent process. This bool directly controls whether the
no_new_privs
flag gets set on the container process. AllowPrivilegeEscalation is true always when the container is: 1) run as Privileged OR 2) hasCAP_SYS_ADMIN
. -
readOnlyRootFilesystem: Mounts the container's root filesystem as read-only.
The above bullets are not a complete set of security context settings -- please see SecurityContext for a comprehensive list.
For more information about security mechanisms in Linux, see Overview of Linux Kernel Security Features
Before you begin
You need to have a Kubernetes cluster, and the kubectl command-line tool must be configured to communicate with your cluster. It is recommended to run this tutorial on a cluster with at least two nodes that are not acting as control plane hosts. If you do not already have a cluster, you can create one by using minikube or you can use one of these Kubernetes playgrounds:
To check the version, enterkubectl version
.
Set the security context for a Pod
To specify security settings for a Pod, include the securityContext
field
in the Pod specification. The securityContext
field is a
PodSecurityContext object.
The security settings that you specify for a Pod apply to all Containers in the Pod.
Here is a configuration file for a Pod that has a securityContext
and an emptyDir
volume:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: security-context-demo
spec:
securityContext:
runAsUser: 1000
runAsGroup: 3000
fsGroup: 2000
volumes:
- name: sec-ctx-vol
emptyDir: {}
containers:
- name: sec-ctx-demo
image: busybox
command: [ "sh", "-c", "sleep 1h" ]
volumeMounts:
- name: sec-ctx-vol
mountPath: /data/demo
securityContext:
allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
In the configuration file, the runAsUser
field specifies that for any Containers in
the Pod, all processes run with user ID 1000. The runAsGroup
field specifies the primary group ID of 3000 for
all processes within any containers of the Pod. If this field is omitted, the primary group ID of the containers
will be root(0). Any files created will also be owned by user 1000 and group 3000 when runAsGroup
is specified.
Since fsGroup
field is specified, all processes of the container are also part of the supplementary group ID 2000.
The owner for volume /data/demo
and any files created in that volume will be Group ID 2000.
Create the Pod:
kubectl apply -f https://k8s.io/examples/pods/security/security-context.yaml
Verify that the Pod's Container is running:
kubectl get pod security-context-demo
Get a shell to the running Container:
kubectl exec -it security-context-demo -- sh
In your shell, list the running processes:
ps
The output shows that the processes are running as user 1000, which is the value of runAsUser
:
PID USER TIME COMMAND
1 1000 0:00 sleep 1h
6 1000 0:00 sh
...
In your shell, navigate to /data
, and list the one directory:
cd /data
ls -l
The output shows that the /data/demo
directory has group ID 2000, which is
the value of fsGroup
.
drwxrwsrwx 2 root 2000 4096 Jun 6 20:08 demo
In your shell, navigate to /data/demo
, and create a file:
cd demo
echo hello > testfile
List the file in the /data/demo
directory:
ls -l
The output shows that testfile
has group ID 2000, which is the value of fsGroup
.
-rw-r--r-- 1 1000 2000 6 Jun 6 20:08 testfile
Run the following command:
$ id
uid=1000 gid=3000 groups=2000
You will see that gid is 3000 which is same as runAsGroup
field. If the runAsGroup
was omitted the gid would
remain as 0(root) and the process will be able to interact with files that are owned by root(0) group and that have
the required group permissions for root(0) group.
Exit your shell:
exit
Configure volume permission and ownership change policy for Pods
Kubernetes v1.20 [beta]
By default, Kubernetes recursively changes ownership and permissions for the contents of each
volume to match the fsGroup
specified in a Pod's securityContext
when that volume is
mounted.
For large volumes, checking and changing ownership and permissions can take a lot of time,
slowing Pod startup. You can use the fsGroupChangePolicy
field inside a securityContext
to control the way that Kubernetes checks and manages ownership and permissions
for a volume.
fsGroupChangePolicy - fsGroupChangePolicy
defines behavior for changing ownership and permission of the volume
before being exposed inside a Pod. This field only applies to volume types that support
fsGroup
controlled ownership and permissions. This field has two possible values:
- OnRootMismatch: Only change permissions and ownership if permission and ownership of root directory does not match with expected permissions of the volume. This could help shorten the time it takes to change ownership and permission of a volume.
- Always: Always change permission and ownership of the volume when volume is mounted.
For example:
securityContext:
runAsUser: 1000
runAsGroup: 3000
fsGroup: 2000
fsGroupChangePolicy: "OnRootMismatch"
Delegating volume permission and ownership change to CSI driver
Kubernetes v1.22 [alpha]
If you deploy a Container Storage Interface (CSI)
driver which supports the VOLUME_MOUNT_GROUP
NodeServiceCapability
, the
process of setting file ownership and permissions based on the
fsGroup
specified in the securityContext
will be performed by the CSI driver
instead of Kubernetes, provided that the DelegateFSGroupToCSIDriver
Kubernetes
feature gate is enabled. In this case, since Kubernetes doesn't perform any
ownership and permission change, fsGroupChangePolicy
does not take effect, and
as specified by CSI, the driver is expected to mount the volume with the
provided fsGroup
, resulting in a volume that is readable/writable by the
fsGroup
.
Please refer to the KEP
and the description of the VolumeCapability.MountVolume.volume_mount_group
field in the CSI spec
for more information.
Set the security context for a Container
To specify security settings for a Container, include the securityContext
field
in the Container manifest. The securityContext
field is a
SecurityContext object.
Security settings that you specify for a Container apply only to
the individual Container, and they override settings made at the Pod level when
there is overlap. Container settings do not affect the Pod's Volumes.
Here is the configuration file for a Pod that has one Container. Both the Pod
and the Container have a securityContext
field:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: security-context-demo-2
spec:
securityContext:
runAsUser: 1000
containers:
- name: sec-ctx-demo-2
image: gcr.io/google-samples/node-hello:1.0
securityContext:
runAsUser: 2000
allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
Create the Pod:
kubectl apply -f https://k8s.io/examples/pods/security/security-context-2.yaml
Verify that the Pod's Container is running:
kubectl get pod security-context-demo-2
Get a shell into the running Container:
kubectl exec -it security-context-demo-2 -- sh
In your shell, list the running processes:
ps aux
The output shows that the processes are running as user 2000. This is the value
of runAsUser
specified for the Container. It overrides the value 1000 that is
specified for the Pod.
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
2000 1 0.0 0.0 4336 764 ? Ss 20:36 0:00 /bin/sh -c node server.js
2000 8 0.1 0.5 772124 22604 ? Sl 20:36 0:00 node server.js
...
Exit your shell:
exit
Set capabilities for a Container
With Linux capabilities,
you can grant certain privileges to a process without granting all the privileges
of the root user. To add or remove Linux capabilities for a Container, include the
capabilities
field in the securityContext
section of the Container manifest.
First, see what happens when you don't include a capabilities
field.
Here is configuration file that does not add or remove any Container capabilities:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: security-context-demo-3
spec:
containers:
- name: sec-ctx-3
image: gcr.io/google-samples/node-hello:1.0
Create the Pod:
kubectl apply -f https://k8s.io/examples/pods/security/security-context-3.yaml
Verify that the Pod's Container is running:
kubectl get pod security-context-demo-3
Get a shell into the running Container:
kubectl exec -it security-context-demo-3 -- sh
In your shell, list the running processes:
ps aux
The output shows the process IDs (PIDs) for the Container:
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
root 1 0.0 0.0 4336 796 ? Ss 18:17 0:00 /bin/sh -c node server.js
root 5 0.1 0.5 772124 22700 ? Sl 18:17 0:00 node server.js
In your shell, view the status for process 1:
cd /proc/1
cat status
The output shows the capabilities bitmap for the process:
...
CapPrm: 00000000a80425fb
CapEff: 00000000a80425fb
...
Make a note of the capabilities bitmap, and then exit your shell:
exit
Next, run a Container that is the same as the preceding container, except that it has additional capabilities set.
Here is the configuration file for a Pod that runs one Container. The configuration
adds the CAP_NET_ADMIN
and CAP_SYS_TIME
capabilities:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: security-context-demo-4
spec:
containers:
- name: sec-ctx-4
image: gcr.io/google-samples/node-hello:1.0
securityContext:
capabilities:
add: ["NET_ADMIN", "SYS_TIME"]
Create the Pod:
kubectl apply -f https://k8s.io/examples/pods/security/security-context-4.yaml
Get a shell into the running Container:
kubectl exec -it security-context-demo-4 -- sh
In your shell, view the capabilities for process 1:
cd /proc/1
cat status
The output shows capabilities bitmap for the process:
...
CapPrm: 00000000aa0435fb
CapEff: 00000000aa0435fb
...
Compare the capabilities of the two Containers:
00000000a80425fb
00000000aa0435fb
In the capability bitmap of the first container, bits 12 and 25 are clear. In the second container,
bits 12 and 25 are set. Bit 12 is CAP_NET_ADMIN
, and bit 25 is CAP_SYS_TIME
.
See capability.h
for definitions of the capability constants.
Note: Linux capability constants have the formCAP_XXX
. But when you list capabilities in your Container manifest, you must omit theCAP_
portion of the constant. For example, to addCAP_SYS_TIME
, includeSYS_TIME
in your list of capabilities.
Set the Seccomp Profile for a Container
To set the Seccomp profile for a Container, include the seccompProfile
field
in the securityContext
section of your Pod or Container manifest. The
seccompProfile
field is a
SeccompProfile object consisting of type
and localhostProfile
.
Valid options for type
include RuntimeDefault
, Unconfined
, and
Localhost
. localhostProfile
must only be set set if type: Localhost
. It
indicates the path of the pre-configured profile on the node, relative to the
kubelet's configured Seccomp profile location (configured with the --root-dir
flag).
Here is an example that sets the Seccomp profile to the node's container runtime default profile:
...
securityContext:
seccompProfile:
type: RuntimeDefault
Here is an example that sets the Seccomp profile to a pre-configured file at
<kubelet-root-dir>/seccomp/my-profiles/profile-allow.json
:
...
securityContext:
seccompProfile:
type: Localhost
localhostProfile: my-profiles/profile-allow.json
Assign SELinux labels to a Container
To assign SELinux labels to a Container, include the seLinuxOptions
field in
the securityContext
section of your Pod or Container manifest. The
seLinuxOptions
field is an
SELinuxOptions
object. Here's an example that applies an SELinux level:
...
securityContext:
seLinuxOptions:
level: "s0:c123,c456"
Note: To assign SELinux labels, the SELinux security module must be loaded on the host operating system.
Discussion
The security context for a Pod applies to the Pod's Containers and also to
the Pod's Volumes when applicable. Specifically fsGroup
and seLinuxOptions
are
applied to Volumes as follows:
-
fsGroup
: Volumes that support ownership management are modified to be owned and writable by the GID specified infsGroup
. See the Ownership Management design document for more details. -
seLinuxOptions
: Volumes that support SELinux labeling are relabeled to be accessible by the label specified underseLinuxOptions
. Usually you only need to set thelevel
section. This sets the Multi-Category Security (MCS) label given to all Containers in the Pod as well as the Volumes.
Warning: After you specify an MCS label for a Pod, all Pods with the same label can access the Volume. If you need inter-Pod protection, you must assign a unique MCS label to each Pod.
Clean up
Delete the Pod:
kubectl delete pod security-context-demo
kubectl delete pod security-context-demo-2
kubectl delete pod security-context-demo-3
kubectl delete pod security-context-demo-4
What's next
- PodSecurityContext
- SecurityContext
- Tuning Docker with the newest security enhancements
- Security Contexts design document
- Ownership Management design document
- Pod Security Policies
- AllowPrivilegeEscalation design document